{"id":10,"date":"2022-09-20T01:58:51","date_gmt":"2022-09-20T01:58:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/wp\/?page_id=10"},"modified":"2023-04-15T13:34:10","modified_gmt":"2023-04-15T13:34:10","slug":"background","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/background\/","title":{"rendered":"Background"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/wp\/index.php\/dog-training-2\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-52 lazyload\" data-src=\"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/Dog-on-beach-sunset-small.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"270\" height=\"236\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" style=\"--smush-placeholder-width: 270px; --smush-placeholder-aspect-ratio: 270\/236;\" \/><\/a>It&#8217;s a fair question &#8211; what&#8217;s up with all these reviews?<\/p>\n<p>I never set out to become some sort of flashlight reviewer or blogger. It really just came about because a number of personal interests of mine happened to be well aligned, at a time when I had a bit more free time than I do today.<\/p>\n<p>To start, I had long-standing interest in evolving portable lighting technology, especially LED lights. I have long carried a small pocket flashlight of some sort, and had been amazed by the rapid change in technology in the early to mid aughts (i.e. ~2001-2005). So I eventually started participating on the main flashlight forum at the time, candlepowerforums.com, and began buying some of the new, innovative LED flashlight models that were coming out &#8211; especially those with digital circuits (e.g., Fenix was an early pioneer). It wasn&#8217;t long before that led to my starting to review lights on the site.<\/p>\n<p>As you can probably guess from my reviews, I have a scientific research background. Along with that, I have a personal interest in quantitative methods, and enjoy doing comparative analysis and testing. Integral to this is communication &#8211; findings ways to clearly present findings in a way that people find clear and useful. I realize that my reviews may seem a little over-whelming (as they grew to be quite extensive), so please check out my <a href=\"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/faq\/\">FAQ<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/methodology\/\">Testing Methods<\/a> pages for more info on what everything means.<\/p>\n<p>A related point was truth in advertising. With any rapidly changing field, there is a tendency for manufacturer claims to leap ahead of actual performance\/capabilities. Even when testing standards were eventually developed, it was still very difficult to compare makes and models across manufacturers. You really need independent <em>comparative<\/em> testing data, collected under the same conditions, in the same manner, for all lights. This is (and remains) what I saw as one of the main value drivers of my reviews.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, I didn&#8217;t set out to do full product reviews initially &#8211; my original goal was simply do comparative output\/runtime assessments of my lights (as explained on the <a href=\"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/methodology\/runtimes\/\">Runtimes<\/a> section of my Methodology\u00a0 section). But people seemed to like to have more context around the lights I was testing, so I started adding additional background, photos of the lights, beamshots, videos of the user interface, etc., etc.<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, manufacturers start sending me lights to test, so that I could compare their performance to other lights I had done. Eventually, this snow-balled into a rather extensive review format and the huge number of lights <a href=\"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/reviews\/\">reviewed<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>It was an exciting time to be a flashlight reviewer. During my main reviewing years (~2008-2016), the max output of new emitters was doubling every 12-18 months or so. Coupled within refinements in optics (e.g., tints, CRI, reflectors), battery technology, and most importantly circuit design, this led to a virtual explosion of makes and models producing some really interesting stuff (not to mention a lot of knock-offs).<\/p>\n<p>But by the mid-teens (i.e., ~2015), things had really slowed down on the innovation front. The technology had matured, and I wasn&#8217;t see much of a change in emitters, batteries or circuits anymore.\u00a0 Frankly, testing got rather repetitive, without much to differentiate samples. I had also developed a new quantitative review hobby that was taking up a lot of my time. To learn more about that, see my inaugural resource post on my return to flashlight testing, here on this new, revamped flashlightreviews.ca.<\/p>\n<p>What has never changed is my goal to provide objective measurement of flashlight performance. My reviews won&#8217;t be as frequent or quite as detailed as before, but all the relevant info will still be there (in fact, it will be easier to find now). I still try to craft my reviews so that they are relevant to the needs of actual people who use them.<\/p>\n<p>Like most people, my portable lighting needs were actually fairly limited initially &#8211; mainly for walking the dog at night (or trying to avoid stepping on the cats in the dark). Of course, now you can just use a cell phone light for that. But there is still value in carrying a dedicated flashlight when the need arises. Of course, if you are reading these pages, then you&#8217;ve probably already figured that out. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n<p>I hope you enjoy the new site and reviews!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s a fair question &#8211; what&#8217;s up with all these reviews? I never set out to become some sort of flashlight reviewer or blogger. It really just came about because a number of personal interests of mine happened to be well aligned, at a time when I had a bit more free time than I do today. To start, I [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-10","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":778,"href":"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/10\/revisions\/778"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/flashlightreviews.ca\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}